Mesures écologiques du nouveau Premier ministre britannique : peseront-elles sur le financement climatique à l’étranger ?
22 juillet 2026
Le nouveau premier ministre britannique a annoncé dès sa première semaine qu’il réduirait le coût des transports publics et de l’électricité, rendant des technologies à faibles émissions comme les voyages en bus, les véhicules électriques et les pompes à chaleurplus accessibles pour les électeurs. Mais une partie du financement de ces politiques provenait du budget de la finance climatique internationale, a indiqué le gouvernement, soulevant des inquiétudes sur l’équité.
L’ancien maire de Manchester, Andy Burnham, a pris la relève de Keir Starmer à la tête du Parti travailliste et au poste de Premier ministre lundi, nommant des défenseurs du climat Ed Miliband au poste de ministre des Affaires étrangères et du Développement et Miatta Fahnbulleh au poste de ministre du Climat et de l’Énergie.
Mardi, Burnham a annoncé que son gouvernement réduirait la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) que les ménages et certaines petites entreprises paient sur leurs factures d’électricité, de 5 % à 0 % à compter du 1er octobre, ce qui permettrait d’économiser 45 £ (60 $) par an pour les ménages.
Mercredi, il a déclaré que le tarif maximal que les compagnies de bus en Angleterre pouvaient facturer pour un seul trajet passerait de 3 £ (4 $) à 2 £ (2,67 $) à partir du 1er janvier 2027. Le gouvernement a indiqué que les subventions pour atteindre cet objectif seraient principalement financées en transférant des fonds destinés à des projets de financement climatique international des subventions vers des prêts. Il n’a pas fourni d’autres informations dans son annonce, tandis que le ministre des Transports britannique a déclaré à Sky News que le plan était encore en cours d’élaboration.
Les changements envisagés du budget de la finance climatique ont été immédiatement critiqués par des groupes œuvrant pour la justice climatique dans les pays en développement, dont Bond, le réseau britannique d’ONG, qui a qualifié cette décision de « décevante ».
Déjà inscrit ?
Connectez-vous ici →
Lire la suite gratuitement
Pendant 15 ans, Climate Home News a mené des reportages rigoureux sur les décisions qui façonnent notre climat.
Rejoignez la communauté de lecteurs qui rend ce travail possible.
Rejoignez gratuitement et continuez à lire →
Moins d’une minute suffit.
Britain’s new prime minister announced in his first week that he will cut the cost of public transport and electricity, making lower-emission technologies like bus travel, electric vehicles and heat pumpsmore affordable for voters. But some of the funding for those policies will come from the budget for international climate finance, the government has said, raising concerns about fairness.
Former Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham took over from Keir Starmer as Labour Party leader and prime minister on Monday, appointing climate advocates Ed Miliband as foreign and development minister and Miatta Fahnbulleh as climate and energy minister.
On Tuesday, Burnham said his government would cut the value added tax (VAT) households and some small businesses pay on their electricity bills from 5% to zero from October 1, saving households £45 ($60) a year.
On Wednesday, he said the maximum fare bus companies in England can charge for a single journey will be reduced from £3 ($4) to £2 ($2.67) from January 1, 2027. The government said the subsidies to achieve this would be mostly funded by switching money set aside for overseas climate finance projects from grants to loans. It did not give further information in its announcement, while the UK’s transport minister told Sky News the plan is still being worked out.
The floated changes to the climate finance budget were immediately criticised by groups working on climate justice for developing countries, including Bond, the UK network for NGOs, which described the decision as « disappointing ».
« Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not the answer and pitches marginalised communities in the UK against marginalised communities in lower-income and climate-vulnerable countries, » BOND CEO Romilly Greenhill said in a statement. « Climate finance must not worsen the debt burden of countries that are already suffering the worst – and most costly – impacts of a climate crisis they did not cause. »
Hunt for money
Burnham promoted both policies as measures to combat the rising cost of living and « give people breathing space », with climate campaigners and industry groups noting they are also likely to reduce the UK’s climate-heating emissions by encouraging bus travel and the use of electric vehicles and heating.
But thorny questions remain over how the policies will be paid for. The government said Tuesday’s VAT cut for electricity would be funded by scrapping the previous government’s digital ID programme, but Darren Jones, a former minister involved with that policy, said it had been « unfunded » – a statement that dominated media coverage.
A day later, the government said the new bus fare cap would cost £454 million ($606m). Transport minister Heidi Alexander told Sky News that £54 million would be taken from an under-spend in the budget of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) and £400 million would come from changing unspecified international climate finance from grants to loans. The details « still need to be worked through », she said, adding that the government « had wanted to make an announcement today ».
Mohamed Adow, director of Nairobi-based think-tank Power Shift Africa, said « climate finance was never meant to be a pot of money that governments raid when they need to pay for domestic spending ».
DESNZ had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication. « We’re not wanting to fleece anyone here, and we actually want to maximise the development potential of this money that is available, » minister Alexander said in her TV interview.
Mohamed Adow speaking on the official final day of COP29. (Photo: UNFCCC/Kiara Worth)
Aside from the controversy over their funding, the policies themselves were widely welcomed by climate campaigners. Jess Ralston, energy lead at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), said the tax cut on electricity bills « could help households to switch to electric heat pumps, protecting UK homes from becoming ever more exposed to the whims of Putin and Trump when turning on their gas boiler ».
The last few months have seen global momentum build behind electrification, spurred by the US-Iran war disrupting oil and gas supplies and driving up prices. The Turkish and Australian COP31 presidencies have announced a global target to boost electrification, backed by the European Union, Canada, Philippines, UK and others.
Campaigners call for lower power prices
While reaction to the VAT cut was supportive, some questioned whether £45 a year of savings per household is enough and called for more measures to cut electricity bills.
Friends of the Earth’s energy lead Imogen Dow said those on the lowest incomes should be given cheaper electricity through a « social tariff » and the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) think-tank – which is close to the Labour Party – said levies on energy bills should be shifted to general taxation.
Matthew Paterson, a politics professor at Manchester University, told Climate Home News that the most effective way to reduce electricity bills is to take on the UK’s private electricity companies, while consumer-oriented measures like the VAT cut are « tinkering around the edges ».
Jarrod Birch, head of policy and public affairs for the EV charging industry association Charge UK, said that while the policy would make home-charging cheaper, people who charge their vehicles at public points will still have to pay 20% VAT. The UK’s tax authority is fighting a court ruling that ordered it to reduce the tax motorists pay on public chargers to the current household rate of 5%.
Further measures will be the responsibility of Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero Miatta Fahnbulleh, who is relatively new to politics after a career at left-wing, pro-climate think tanks the IPPR and the New Economics Foundation.
Fahnbulleh and Healey leave 10 Downing Street following Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s first cabinet meeting, on July 21, 2026 in London, England. (Photo: Ben Montgomery/Getty Images)
Michael Jacobs, political economy professor at Sheffield University et ancien conseiller du premier ministre travailliste britannique Gordon Brown, a dit que Fahnbulleh serait une « défenseure du climat » qui poursuivrait l’« agenda climatique progressiste » de sa prédécesseure Ed Miliband.
« C’est une personne très créative, une vraie férue des politiques, donc je m’attends à beaucoup d’innovations politiques sous sa direction », a-t-il déclaré, « je pense qu’elle explorera de nouvelles façons d’encourager l’adoption des pompes à chaleur et des batteries domestiques ».
Aid budget in Miliband’s hands
Despite reports he could be made finance minister, Miliband has been appointed Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. Miliband has attended many climate COP meetings over several decades, most recently representing the UK at COP29 and COP30, and has been targeted by the right-wing media for his support for climate action and opposition to new oil and gas drilling in the UK’s part of the North Sea.
UK cuts support for climate action abroad to fund military instead
Jacobs said he expected Miliband to prioritise climate and development in the UK’s foreign policy and to push Burnham and new finance minister John Healey to reverse Starmer’s aid cuts.
But there are fears Healey could try to cut the aid budget further to fund the military. Healey was a surprise pick for Chancellor of the Exchequer and grabbed headlines when he resigned as Starmer’s defence minister in June over what he saw as insufficient defence spending.
Françoise Perrin
Rédactrice française engagée dans l’information citoyenne, je m’intéresse aux liens entre écologie, démocratie et solidarité. À travers mes articles, je cherche à rendre les grands enjeux de société plus clairs, plus accessibles et plus proches du terrain, en donnant une place aux initiatives, aux débats et aux voix qui participent à transformer notre époque.